Editor’s note: This story has been updated to remove an offensive Reddit username.
Recently, a Redditor sparked a discussion on Meta Platforms Inc META, the parent company of Facebook, about its announced $50 billion buyback. The question at the center of the debate: Is it good or bad?
Related: Unveiling Meta’s Game-Changing Dividend And A $50 Billion Surprise – How This Tech Titan is Redefining Shareholder Value
Redditors Hold Differing Opinions
Redditors’ viewpoints regarding Meta’s $50 billion buyback:
- Divergent Logic: User gizamo cautions against assuming a direct correlation between large buybacks and stock price increases. They cite a Micron Technology Inc MU example where a significant buyback did not lead to positive stock outcomes.
- Optimistic Perspective: Diamondhands4dagainz sees a buyback as a bullish move, like a dividend. Reducing the shares in circulation could raise the average price per share, potentially benefiting existing shareholders.
- Consideration of Valuation: Throwaway_Molasses emphasizes the importance of the stock’s valuation. A buyback is seen as positive when the stock is undervalued but negative when overvalued.
- Timing and Insider Trading: m264 suggests that share buybacks at peak overvaluation might maintain short-term stock momentum, especially if insiders plan to sell.
- Already Factored In: badtradesguynumber2 argues that the $50 billion buyback and the dividend might already be accounted for in the stock price, aligning with the efficient market hypothesis.
- Buffett’s Insights: CanYouPleaseChill quotes Warren Buffett to stress the importance of price in repurchase decisions, highlighting the potential destruction of shareholder value.
- Growth Considerations: FarrisAT speculates that Meta’s decision to buy back shares indicates their belief in undervaluation or fair valuation, suggesting fewer growth opportunities through acquisitions compared to the benefits of buybacks.
The range of opinions from Redditors reflects the complexity of evaluating Meta’s $50 billion buyback. While some see it as a beneficial move for existing shareholders, others raise concerns about timing, valuation, and potential long-term impact.
Photo: Shutterstock
